Randall v. Eyman
This text of 425 P.2d 570 (Randall v. Eyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner has filed his petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus setting forth that this court had on November 3, 1966, entered a per curiam order setting aside the judgment and commitment of the Superior Court of Pima County and directing that the custody of petitioner be transferred from the State Prison at Florence, Arizona to the Sheriff of Pima County for re-sentencing, 101 Ariz. 343, 419 P.2d 522.
The petitioner contends that by reason of the unreasonable delay of now nearly five months in complying with the judgment of this court he should be discharged. We agree.
There being no reasonable excuse appearing under the facts of this case for the delay it is hereby ordered that this Writ of Habeas Corpus issue and that the petitioner be discharged forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
425 P.2d 570, 102 Ariz. 100, 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-eyman-ariz-1967.