Randall v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Service

559 So. 2d 386, 1990 WL 40321
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1990·No. No. 89-2352·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McLaughlin v. Department of Natural Resources, 526 So.2d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Holmes v. Turlington, 480 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Heifetz v. Department of Business Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); City of Miami v. Kory, 394 So.2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State Beverage Department v. Ernal, Inc., 115 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959); Section 916.178, Florida Statutes (1987). Compare Griessenaur v. Department of Energy, 754 F.2d 361 (U.S.Ct.App.Fed.Cir.1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randall v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Service, 559 So. 2d 386, 1990 WL 40321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

559 So. 2d 386 (Randall v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richard J. Griessenauer v. Department of Energy
754 F.2d 361 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Holmes v. Turlington
480 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
McLaughlin v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT. RES.
526 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
City of Miami v. Kory
394 So. 2d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Heifetz v. Dept. of Business Regulation
475 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
State Beverage Department v. Ernal, Inc.
115 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)