Randall v. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog

228 F. 1022, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2086
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 15, 1915·No. No. 1346·Published

Opinion

PEB CUBIAM.

The facts of this case are fully stated and discussed in the opinion of the court below (217 Fed. 902), and nothing would be gained by repetition. We agree with the learned District Judge that on the whole “the libelant has a little the better of the argument,” and are therefore of opinion that the decree appealed from should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Randall v. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog, 228 F. 1022, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2086 (4th Cir. 1915).

228 F. 1022 (Randall v. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dampskibselskabet Dannebrog v. Randall
217 F. 902 (D. Maryland, 1914)