Randall v. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog
228 F. 1022, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2086
This text of 228 F. 1022 (Randall v. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Randall v. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog, 228 F. 1022, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2086 (4th Cir. 1915).
Opinion
The facts of this case are fully stated and discussed in the opinion of the court below (217 Fed. 902), and nothing would be gained by repetition. We agree with the learned District Judge that on the whole “the libelant has a little the better of the argument,” and are therefore of opinion that the decree appealed from should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dampskibselskabet Dannebrog v. Randall
217 F. 902 (D. Maryland, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 F. 1022, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-dampskibsselskabet-dannebrog-ca4-1915.