Randall v. . Bixby
88 N.E. 1129, 195 N.Y. 514, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1059
Opinion
*515 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the negligence complained of was that of a fellow-servant in a detail of the work discharged by a fellow-servant. The court is of opinion that the notice under the Employers’ Liability Act was served within the time prescribed by law; no opinion.
Concur : Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Gray, J., is of opinion that the notice was not served in time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Randall v. . Bixby, 88 N.E. 1129, 195 N.Y. 514, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1059 (N.Y. 1909).
88 N.E. 1129 (Randall v. . Bixby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.