Randall v. . Bixby

New York Court of Appeals

Randall v. . Bixby

88 N.E. 1129, 195 N.Y. 514, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1059

DecidedMarch 16, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.E. 1129 (Randall v. . Bixby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randall v. . Bixby, 88 N.E. 1129, 195 N.Y. 514, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1059 (N.Y. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

*515 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the negligence complained of was that of a fellow-servant in a detail of the work discharged by a fellow-servant. The court is of opinion that the notice under the Employers’ Liability Act was served within the time prescribed by law; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Gray, J., is of opinion that the notice was not served in time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*515 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the negligence complained of was that of a fellow-servant in a detail of the work discharged by a fellow-servant. The court is of opinion that the notice under the Employers’ Liability Act was served within the time prescribed by law; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Gray, J., is of opinion that the notice was not served in time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 N.E. 1129, 195 N.Y. 514, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-bixby-ny-1909.