Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis
This text of Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis (Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-17-00049-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
RANDALL ONEAL MATHIS, § APPEAL FROM THE 115TH APPELLANT
V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FREDERICKA ANTOINETTE MATHIS, § UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). On February 10, 2017, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Randall Oneal Mathis, that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee on or before February 21, 2017, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. See id. Opinion delivered February 28, 2017. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
FEBRUARY 28, 2017
RANDALL ONEAL MATHIS, Appellant V. FREDERICKA ANTOINETTE MATHIS, Appellee
Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 372-15)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-oneal-mathis-v-fredericka-antoinette-mathis-texapp-2017.