Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 28, 2017
Docket12-17-00049-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis (Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

NO. 12-17-00049-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RANDALL ONEAL MATHIS, § APPEAL FROM THE 115TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FREDERICKA ANTOINETTE MATHIS, § UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). On February 10, 2017, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant, Randall Oneal Mathis, that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee on or before February 21, 2017, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. See id. Opinion delivered February 28, 2017. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 28, 2017

RANDALL ONEAL MATHIS, Appellant V. FREDERICKA ANTOINETTE MATHIS, Appellee

Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 372-15)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Randall Oneal Mathis v. Fredericka Antoinette Mathis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-oneal-mathis-v-fredericka-antoinette-mathis-texapp-2017.