Randall Harper v. City of Monterey

519 F. App'x 503
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2013
Docket12-15353
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 519 F. App'x 503 (Randall Harper v. City of Monterey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randall Harper v. City of Monterey, 519 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Randall Lynn Harper appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various federal and state law claims related to his car being towed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 519 F.3d 1025, 1030 (9th Cir.2008), and we affirm.

Contrary to Harper’s contentions, the clerk properly declined Harper’s requests for entry of default because defendants filed timely motions to dismiss Harper’s action for failure to state a claim. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a) (providing that a default can be entered against a party only where that party “has failed to plead or otherwise defend”).

Harper’s contentions regarding personal jurisdiction and venue are unpersuasive.

Harper’s pending motions for judicial notice and entry of default are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brian T. Hill v. Ralph Diaz
C.D. California, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 F. App'x 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-harper-v-city-of-monterey-ca9-2013.