Randall Eugene Barton, Sr. v. State of Florida
This text of Randall Eugene Barton, Sr. v. State of Florida (Randall Eugene Barton, Sr. v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-1712 _____________________________
RANDALL EUGENE BARTON, SR.,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County. James M. Colaw, Judge.
October 21, 2019
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Evans v. State, 643 So. 2d 1204, 1205-06 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (“To secure a conviction on an aider and abettor theory, the state must establish (1) that the defendant helped the person who actually committed the crime by doing or saying something that caused, encouraged, incited or otherwise assisted that person to commit the crime; and (2) that the defendant intended to participate in the crime.”); § 777.011, Fla. Stat. (2017).
WOLF, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Randall Eugene Barton, Sr. v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-eugene-barton-sr-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.