Randal v. Stone & Co.

1 Ga. L. Rep. 230
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 230 (Randal v. Stone & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randal v. Stone & Co., 1 Ga. L. Rep. 230 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Hall, J.

Where, at the time when a case was tried, the losing party-made a motion for a new trial, which*was approved by the court, subject to future revision, and ordered to be spread upon the minutes, and th8 rule nisi was made returnable to the next term, and where there was not sufficient time during the term to make out and file a brief of the oral and copy of the written testimony, and the court granted an order that defendant have thirty days after the adjournment to file a brief of evidence, subject to the approval of the court and revision of counsel, this did not require the approval of the brief before it was filed, and if it was filed within the time prescribed it was error, on the call of the motion, to dismiss it because the brief of evidence had not. been approved.

Judgment reversed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randal-v-stone-co-ga-1885.