Randal v. State ex rel. Massy
This text of 1 Ind. 395 (Randal v. State ex rel. Massy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS was a suit upon the same bond described in the record of the suit instituted by The State ex rel. Hummed v. Comparet et al., in which the judgment was reversed by this Court at the November term, 1845
It appears that, after the decision of this Court in the case above mentioned, the plaintiff below appeared in the Circuit Court, and, upon his motion, the plea of the defendants setting out the bond on oyer, was ordered to be so amended as to make the instrument set out in the plea correspond with that described in the declaration. We cannot consider the defect remedied, by this proceeding. The Court had no power to make such an alteration in the record after the judgment, in the absence of the defendants and without their consent.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial.
See 7 Blackf. 553.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ind. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randal-v-state-ex-rel-massy-ind-1849.