Randal v. Hillside Pleasure Park Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Randal v. Hillside Pleasure Park Co.

107 A. 587, 90 N.J. Eq. 604, 5 Stock. 604, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 270

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 20, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions raised on the appeal in this case are identical with those reviewed and decided in Hedden v. Hand, No. 24 o! the March term, 1919 (see aiüe p. 535), and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the order of the court of chancery is reversed.

For affirmance — "White—1.

For reversal — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, I-Ieppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner — 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The questions raised on the appeal in this case are identical with those reviewed and decided in Hedden v. Hand, No. 24 o! the March term, 1919 (see aiüe p. 535), and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the order of the court of chancery is reversed.

For affirmance — "White—1.

For reversal — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, I-Ieppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner — 10.

Randal v. Hillside Pleasure Park Co., 107 A. 587, 90 N.J. Eq. 604, 5 Stock. 604, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 270 (N.J. 1919).

Pincite

107 A. 587 (Randal v. Hillside Pleasure Park Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.