Randal v. Hillside Pleasure Park Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Randal v. Hillside Pleasure Park Co.

107 A. 587, 90 N.J. Eq. 604, 5 Stock. 604, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 270

DecidedJune 20, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A. 587 (Randal v. Hillside Pleasure Park Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randal v. Hillside Pleasure Park Co., 107 A. 587, 90 N.J. Eq. 604, 5 Stock. 604, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 270 (N.J. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions raised on the appeal in this case are identical with those reviewed and decided in Hedden v. Hand, No. 24 o! the March term, 1919 (see aiüe p. 535), and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the order of the court of chancery is reversed.

For affirmance — "White—1.

For reversal — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, I-Ieppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner — 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The questions raised on the appeal in this case are identical with those reviewed and decided in Hedden v. Hand, No. 24 o! the March term, 1919 (see aiüe p. 535), and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the order of the court of chancery is reversed.

For affirmance — "White—1.

For reversal — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, I-Ieppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner — 10.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A. 587, 90 N.J. Eq. 604, 5 Stock. 604, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randal-v-hillside-pleasure-park-co-nj-1919.