Randal v. Gehm

Appellate Court of Illinois

Randal v. Gehm

61 Ill. App. 307, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 763

DecidedDecember 12, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Ill. App. 307 (Randal v. Gehm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Randal v. Gehm, 61 Ill. App. 307, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 763 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The controversy in this case is whether the appellee pit id the collector of the appellants for a car load of potatoes. Either the appellee or the collector perjured himself, and it is impossible that we should know which did. The court without a jury found for the appellee, whose version was in keeping with the fact that he had the collector’s receipt, and such finding is conclusive.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The controversy in this case is whether the appellee pit id the collector of the appellants for a car load of potatoes. Either the appellee or the collector perjured himself, and it is impossible that we should know which did. The court without a jury found for the appellee, whose version was in keeping with the fact that he had the collector’s receipt, and such finding is conclusive.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Ill. App. 307, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randal-v-gehm-illappct-1895.