Randal v. Baker

274 So. 2d 564
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1973
DocketNo. 72-665
StatusPublished

This text of 274 So. 2d 564 (Randal v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randal v. Baker, 274 So. 2d 564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Betty T. Randal, appeals a summary final judgment entered for the appellees who are medical doctors. Appellant’s complaint charged medical malpractice in the performance of cosmetic surgery. The trial judge entered a summary judgment for the appellees upon the basis of the pleadings, affidavits and discovery in the file. We have thoroughly examined the record in the light of appellant’s brief and we find that this case is governed by the principles set forth in Rosen v. Parkway General Hospital, Inc., Fla.App. 1972, 265 So.2d 93. See also Martin v. Parks, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 220; Crovella v. Cochrane, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 307.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crovella v. Cochrane
102 So. 2d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Martin v. Parks
165 So. 2d 220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Rosen v. Parkway General Hospital, Inc.
265 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 So. 2d 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randal-v-baker-fladistctapp-1973.