Randal v. Baker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Randal v. Baker

274 So. 2d 564

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1973·No. No. 72-665·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Betty T. Randal, appeals a summary final judgment entered for the appellees who are medical doctors. Appellant’s complaint charged medical malpractice in the performance of cosmetic surgery. The trial judge entered a summary judgment for the appellees upon the basis of the pleadings, affidavits and discovery in the file. We have thoroughly examined the record in the light of appellant’s brief and we find that this case is governed by the principles set forth in Rosen v. Parkway General Hospital, Inc., Fla.App. 1972, 265 So.2d 93. See also Martin v. Parks, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 220; Crovella v. Cochrane, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 307.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Betty T. Randal, appeals a summary final judgment entered for the appellees who are medical doctors. Appellant’s complaint charged medical malpractice in the performance of cosmetic surgery. The trial judge entered a summary judgment for the appellees upon the basis of the pleadings, affidavits and discovery in the file. We have thoroughly examined the record in the light of appellant’s brief and we find that this case is governed by the principles set forth in Rosen v. Parkway General Hospital, Inc., Fla.App. 1972, 265 So.2d 93. See also Martin v. Parks, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 220; Crovella v. Cochrane, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 307.

Affirmed.

Randal v. Baker, 274 So. 2d 564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

274 So. 2d 564 (Randal v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related