RANDAL THOMAS ROSADO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 12, 2023
Docket22-0164
StatusPublished

This text of RANDAL THOMAS ROSADO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (RANDAL THOMAS ROSADO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
RANDAL THOMAS ROSADO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

RANDAL THOMAS ROSADO, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D22-164

[January 12, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016CF002305AXXXXX.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, and Randal Thomas Rosado, Crawford, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
RANDAL THOMAS ROSADO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randal-thomas-rosado-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.