Rand v. The Proprietors of the Upper Locks & Canals on Connecticut River

3 Day 441
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

In this case, the writ and process has been no otherwise served than by leaving a copy thereof at the usual place of abode of James Bull, oí Hartford, in Connecticut, who is described therein as one of the principal proprietors, and one of the directors of the corporate body.

Serving a summons upon any private individual of a corporation is not due and legal notice to the corporate body.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rand v. The Proprietors of the Upper Locks & Canals on Connecticut River, 3 Day 441 (Colo. 1809).

3 Day 441 (Rand v. The Proprietors of the Upper Locks & Canals on Connecticut River) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelley v. Mississippi Central R.
1 F. 564 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1880)