Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co.

59 N.H. 363
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1879
StatusPublished

This text of 59 N.H. 363 (Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co., 59 N.H. 363 (N.H. 1879).

Opinion

Stanley, J.

Common carriers may, by express contract, limit their common-law liability. Moses v. B. & M. R. R., 24 N. H. 71, 90; York Co. v. Central R. R., 3 Wall. 107; Pemberton Co. v. N. Y. C. R. R., 104 Mass. 144; Grace v. Adams, 100 Mass. 505; Scho. Bailm. 454, and notes. The referee has found that by the contract of the parties the defendant was not to be liable for damage caused by fire, and that the defendant was without fault.

Judgment for the defendant.

Foster and Allen, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

York Company v. Central Railroad
70 U.S. 107 (Supreme Court, 1866)
Grace v. Adams
100 Mass. 505 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Pemberton Co. v. New York Central Railroad
104 Mass. 144 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 N.H. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rand-v-the-merchants-dispatch-trans-co-nh-1879.