Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co.

59 N.H. 363
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1879·Published

Opinion

Stanley, J.

Common carriers may, by express contract, limit their common-law liability. Moses v. B. & M. R. R., 24 N. H. 71, 90; York Co. v. Central R. R., 3 Wall. 107; Pemberton Co. v. N. Y. C. R. R., 104 Mass. 144; Grace v. Adams, 100 Mass. 505; Scho. Bailm. 454, and notes. The referee has found that by the contract of the parties the defendant was not to be liable for damage caused by fire, and that the defendant was without fault.

Judgment for the defendant.

Foster and Allen, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co., 59 N.H. 363 (N.H. 1879).

59 N.H. 363 (Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

York Company v. Central Railroad
70 U.S. 107 (Supreme Court, 1866)
Grace v. Adams
100 Mass. 505 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Pemberton Co. v. New York Central Railroad
104 Mass. 144 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1870)