Rand v. State

539 So. 2d 24, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1056, 1989 WL 17236
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rand v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 659
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 1989·No. No. 86-3299·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant James Rand entered a plea of no contest to several felony charges including trafficking in cocaine and possession of cocaine. He now argues that the trial court erred in adjudging him guilty of and sentencing for these two offenses. See Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987). Because we cannot determine from the record before us whether the two charges concern a single quantity of the controlled substance, we affirm without prejudice to Rand to seek relief in the trial court via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Glenn v. State, 537 So.2d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rand v. State, 539 So. 2d 24, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1056, 1989 WL 17236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

539 So. 2d 24 (Rand v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glenn v. State
537 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Carawan v. State
515 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)