Rand v. State

539 So. 2d 24, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1056, 1989 WL 17236
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 1989
DocketNo. 86-3299
StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 24 (Rand v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rand v. State, 539 So. 2d 24, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1056, 1989 WL 17236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant James Rand entered a plea of no contest to several felony charges including trafficking in cocaine and possession of cocaine. He now argues that the trial court erred in adjudging him guilty of and sentencing for these two offenses. See Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987). Because we cannot determine from the record before us whether the two charges concern a single quantity of the controlled substance, we affirm without prejudice to Rand to seek relief in the trial court via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Glenn v. State, 537 So.2d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glenn v. State
537 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Carawan v. State
515 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 24, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1056, 1989 WL 17236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rand-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.