Rand v. State
129 Ala. 119
Opinion
Under the principles declared in Jones v. State, 67 Ala. 84, and reaffirmed in Parker v. State, 77 Ala. 47, it must be held that no error was committed in the exclusion of testimony offered in behalf of defendant.
The evidence if entitled to be believed, proved every act essential to establish the defendant’s guilt. Therefore, the giving of the charge requested by the State was not erroneous.
No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rand v. State, 129 Ala. 119 (Ala. 1900).
129 Ala. 119 (Rand v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garner v. State
64 So. 183 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)