Rand v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Rand v. State

129 Ala. 119

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 Ala. 119 (Rand v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rand v. State, 129 Ala. 119 (Ala. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

SHARPE, J.

Under the principles declared in Jones v. State, 67 Ala. 84, and reaffirmed in Parker v. State, 77 Ala. 47, it must be held that no error was committed in the exclusion of testimony offered in behalf of defendant.

The evidence if entitled to be believed, proved every act essential to establish the defendant’s guilt. Therefore, the giving of the charge requested by the State was not erroneous.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHARPE, J.

Under the principles declared in Jones v. State, 67 Ala. 84, and reaffirmed in Parker v. State, 77 Ala. 47, it must be held that no error was committed in the exclusion of testimony offered in behalf of defendant.

The evidence if entitled to be believed, proved every act essential to establish the defendant’s guilt. Therefore, the giving of the charge requested by the State was not erroneous.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 Ala. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rand-v-state-ala-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack