Rand v. Public Bank
167 A.D. 927
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1915
StatusPublished
This text of 167 A.D. 927 (Rand v. Public Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rand v. Public Bank, 167 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend [928]*928on payment of costs. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. (McLaughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented on the ground that the complaint stated no cause of action.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
167 A.D. 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rand-v-public-bank-nyappdiv-1915.