Rand v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rand v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

47 A.D.2d 669, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 669 (Rand v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rand v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 47 A.D.2d 669, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In this action for a judgment declaring that certain shares of stock are the property of plaintiff and directing that certificates therefor be transferred to plaintiff, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 4, 1974, which (1) vacated a prior order that had been granted on default and (2) directed that plaintiff serve a bill of particulars. At a conference in this court held on January 6, 1975, respondent and appellant, through their respective attorneys, entered into a written stipulation in which they settled the action and agreed that the appeal is withdrawn. In accordance with the stipulation, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs, and the County Clerk is directed to return to plaintiff the $5,000 on deposit with him, with interest, if any, which $5,000 was thus deposited pursuant to a court order. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuseello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this action for a judgment declaring that certain shares of stock are the property of plaintiff and directing that certificates therefor be transferred to plaintiff, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 4, 1974, which (1) vacated a prior order that had been granted on default and (2) directed that plaintiff serve a bill of particulars. At a conference in this court held on January 6, 1975, respondent and appellant, through their respective attorneys, entered into a written stipulation in which they settled the action and agreed that the appeal is withdrawn. In accordance with the stipulation, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs, and the County Clerk is directed to return to plaintiff the $5,000 on deposit with him, with interest, if any, which $5,000 was thus deposited pursuant to a court order. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuseello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 669, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rand-v-merrill-lynch-pierce-fenner-smith-inc-nyappdiv-1975.