Rand v. Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Rand v. Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc.

291 F. App'x 249

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 26, 2008·No. Nos. 07-13883 to 07-13891·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Several plaintiffs, whose product-liability claims against Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., were consolidated, appeal the summary judgment in favor of Hoffman-LaRoche that was based on a ruling by the district court that their causation evidence was inadmissible. See In re Accutane Prods. Liab., 511 F.Supp.2d 1288 (M.D.Fla.2007). We have considered the briefs, the relevant parts of the record, and the well-reasoned opinion by the district court and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the evidence and properly granted summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Several plaintiffs, whose product-liability claims against Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., were consolidated, appeal the summary judgment in favor of Hoffman-LaRoche that was based on a ruling by the district court that their causation evidence was inadmissible. See In re Accutane Prods. Liab., 511 F.Supp.2d 1288 (M.D.Fla.2007). We have considered the briefs, the relevant parts of the record, and the well-reasoned opinion by the district court and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the evidence and properly granted summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Rand v. Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., 291 F. App'x 249 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

291 F. App'x 249 (Rand v. Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related