Rand-Shepard Co. v. Dollar Savings Institution, Inc.

142 So. 649, 106 Fla. 46
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 24, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The endorser o'f a note secured by mortgage is1 neither a necessary nor a proper party defendant in a suit to foreclose the mortgage. This point having been raised by the indorser by demurrer which was overruled, the decree appealed from must be reversed upon the authority of the recent case of Delbeck Inv. Co. vs. Raff, 136 So. 683.

It is so ordered.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur. Wi-iitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rand-Shepard Co. v. Dollar Savings Institution, Inc., 142 So. 649, 106 Fla. 46 (Fla. 1932).

142 So. 649 (Rand-Shepard Co. v. Dollar Savings Institution, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delbeck Investment Co. v. Raff
136 So. 683 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)