Rand Res. v. City of Carson

381 P.3d 229, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 282, 2016 Cal. LEXIS 7884
California Supreme Court·Decided September 21, 2016·No. S235735·Published

Opinion

The petitions for review are granted. The issues to be briefed and argued by the parties are limited to the following: (1) Did plaintiffs' causes of action alleging the breach of and interference with an exclusive agency agreement to negotiate the designation and development of a National Football League (NFL) stadium and related claims arise out of a public issue or an issue of public interest within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 ? (2) Did plaintiffs' causes of action arise out of communications made in connection with an issue under consideration by a legislative body? The requests for an order directing depublication of the opinion are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rand Res. v. City of Carson, 381 P.3d 229, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 282, 2016 Cal. LEXIS 7884 (Cal. 2016).

381 P.3d 229 (Rand Res. v. City of Carson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.