Rand Broadcasting of Tampa-St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Packwood

181 So. 2d 350
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1965·No. No. 5152·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff below. A careful review of the pleadings and affidavits considered by the lower court on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reveal issues of fact concerning the apparent or actual agency of Joyce Keene to obligate the Defendant for the services performed by the Plaintiff.

One issue raised is whether the contracting of Plaintiff’s services by Joyce Keene was with the full knowledge and approval of the Station Manager. In addition, by her affidavit, Joyce Keene affirmatively stated she had the authority to bind her employer for the work performed. The affidavit of the manager denied these facts.

It follows that the summary final judgment should be reversed upon the authority of Jones v. Stoutenburgh, Fla., 91 So.2d 299.

Reversed.

ALLEN, C. J., SHANNON, J., and BARKER, ROGER 'A., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rand Broadcasting of Tampa-St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Packwood, 181 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

181 So. 2d 350 (Rand Broadcasting of Tampa-St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Packwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herold v. Computer Components International, Inc.
252 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)