Rand Broadcasting of Tampa-St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Packwood
This text of 181 So. 2d 350 (Rand Broadcasting of Tampa-St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Packwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a final summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff below. A careful review of the pleadings and affidavits considered by the lower court on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reveal issues of fact concerning the apparent or actual agency of Joyce Keene to obligate the Defendant for the services performed by the Plaintiff.
One issue raised is whether the contracting of Plaintiff’s services by Joyce Keene was with the full knowledge and approval of the Station Manager. In addition, by her affidavit, Joyce Keene affirmatively stated she had the authority to bind her employer for the work performed. The affidavit of the manager denied these facts.
It follows that the summary final judgment should be reversed upon the authority of Jones v. Stoutenburgh, Fla., 91 So.2d 299.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 So. 2d 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rand-broadcasting-of-tampa-st-petersburg-inc-v-packwood-fladistctapp-1965.