Rancosky, M. v. Washington Nat'l Ins.
This text of Rancosky, M. v. Washington Nat'l Ins. (Rancosky, M. v. Washington Nat'l Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MATTHEW RANCOSKY, : No. 127 WAL 2016 ADMINISTRATOR DBN OF THE ESTATE : OF LEANN RANCOSKY AND MATTHEW : RANCOSKY, EXECUTOR OF THE : Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal ESTATE OF MARTIN L. RANCOSKY, : from the Order of the Superior Court : Petitioner : : : v. : : : WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE : COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR BY : MERGER TO CONSECO HEALTH : INSURANCE COMPANY, FORMERLY : KNOWN AS CAPITOL AMERICAN LIFE : INSURANCE COMPANY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2016, the Cross-Petition for Allowance of
Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rancosky, M. v. Washington Nat'l Ins., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rancosky-m-v-washington-natl-ins-pa-2016.