Rancosky, M. v. Washington Nat'l Ins.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 30, 2016·No. 127 WAL 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

MATTHEW RANCOSKY, : No. 127 WAL 2016 ADMINISTRATOR DBN OF THE ESTATE : OF LEANN RANCOSKY AND MATTHEW : RANCOSKY, EXECUTOR OF THE : Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal ESTATE OF MARTIN L. RANCOSKY, : from the Order of the Superior Court :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE : COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR BY : MERGER TO CONSECO HEALTH : INSURANCE COMPANY, FORMERLY : KNOWN AS CAPITOL AMERICAN LIFE : INSURANCE COMPANY, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2016, the Cross-Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rancosky, M. v. Washington Nat'l Ins., (Pa. 2016).

Rancosky, M. v. Washington Nat'l Ins. (Rancosky, M. v. Washington Nat'l Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.