Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corp.

Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corp.

763 N.E.2d 1184, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 534
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 Ohio St. 3d 121 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 2002·No. 01-2154·Published

Opinion

Summit App. No. 20523. On discretionary appeal. Appeal allowed.

P.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

On motion for admission pro hac vice of Connie J. Elliano by Robert M. Stefancin and Rebecca A. Kueera, and on motion for admission pro hac vice of Andrew T. Savage by Robert M. Stefancin and Rebecca A. Kueera. Motions granted.

P.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

On motion to strike memos of Future Settlement, amici memo of Lawfunds, LLC, et al., and amended memo of Interim Settlement. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corp., 763 N.E.2d 1184, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 534 (Ohio 2002).

763 N.E.2d 1184 (Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.