Rancho Viejo v. Norton, Gale

334 F.3d 1158, 357 U.S. App. D.C. 336, 2003 WL 21692175
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 22, 2003·No. 01-5373·Published

Opinions

Circuit Judge SENTELLE and Circuit Judge ROBERTS would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.

Separate statements of Circuit Judge SENTELLE and Circuit Judge ROBERTS dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc are attached.

PER CURIAM:

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rancho Viejo v. Norton, Gale, 334 F.3d 1158, 357 U.S. App. D.C. 336, 2003 WL 21692175 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

334 F.3d 1158 (Rancho Viejo v. Norton, Gale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GDF Realty Investments, Ltd. v. Norton
326 F.3d 622 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Salerno
481 U.S. 739 (Supreme Court, 1987)
United States v. Lopez
514 U.S. 549 (Supreme Court, 1995)
United States v. Morrison
529 U.S. 598 (Supreme Court, 2000)
National Association Of Home Builders v. Babbitt
130 F.3d 1041 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
Rancho Viejo, LLC v. Norton
323 F.3d 1062 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)