Rancho La Valencia, Inc. and Charles R. Randy Turner v. Aquaplex, Inc. and James Edward Jones, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 25, 2011
Docket07-06-00157-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rancho La Valencia, Inc. and Charles R. Randy Turner v. Aquaplex, Inc. and James Edward Jones, Jr. (Rancho La Valencia, Inc. and Charles R. Randy Turner v. Aquaplex, Inc. and James Edward Jones, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rancho La Valencia, Inc. and Charles R. Randy Turner v. Aquaplex, Inc. and James Edward Jones, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NO. 07-06-00157-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

APRIL 25, 2011

RANCHO LA VALENCIA, INC. AND

CHARLES R. RANDY TURNER, APPELLANTS

v.

AQUAPLEX, INC. AND

JAMES EDWARD JONES, JR., APPELLEES

FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY;

NO. GN304287; HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY

            This Court has received notice that appellant, Charles R. “Randy” Turner, has filed for bankruptcy protection in Cause No. 10-38381 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas.  Attached to this notice is a copy of the Notice of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case, Meeting of Creditors, and Deadlines indicating that the case was filed on December 13, 2010.  See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1.  Thus, pursuant to the statutory automatic stay, we suspend this appeal.  See 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a) (West 2004 & Supp. 2010); Tex. R. App. P. 8.

            We abate this appeal until further order of this Court.  The parties are directed to take such action as is appropriate to advise the Clerk of this Court of any change in the status of Turner’s bankruptcy proceeding which would affect the status of this appeal, including but not limited to the filing of a motion to reinstate or sever pursuant to Rule 8.3.  See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3.

Per Curiam


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rancho La Valencia, Inc. and Charles R. Randy Turner v. Aquaplex, Inc. and James Edward Jones, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rancho-la-valencia-inc-and-charles-r-randy-turner--texapp-2011.