Ranch v. Iberlin Ranch
This text of 614 P.2d 1339 (Ranch v. Iberlin Ranch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Upon examination of the record, the Court finds that there is no final adjudication as to the rights of one or more of the parties in that no judgment has been rendered as to the remaining causes of action put forth in the plaintiff’s complaint. Nor have the cross claims of the defendant Charles Molle been addressed so as to thereby state that his rights have been adjudicated.
This Court has in the past stated that no appeal will lie from an order granting a partial summary judgment as such is not a final order under Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P. Hayes v. Nielson, Wyo., 568 P.2d 905 (1977).
Furthermore, this Court has stated that despite an express determination by the trial court that there is no just reason for delay, this Court will not consider piecemeal appeals. Mott v. England, Wyo., 604 P.2d 560, 563 (1979); Butts v. Gierse, Wyo., 573 P.2d 1365 (1978).
On the Court’s own motion, pursuant to Rule 1.02, W.R.A.P., it is
ORDERED that the above-captioned appeal be and is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 P.2d 1339, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranch-v-iberlin-ranch-wyo-1980.