Ranch v. Iberlin Ranch

614 P.2d 1339, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 310
Wyoming Supreme Court·Decided August 12, 1980·No. No. 5347·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Upon examination of the record, the Court finds that there is no final adjudication as to the rights of one or more of the parties in that no judgment has been rendered as to the remaining causes of action put forth in the plaintiff’s complaint. Nor have the cross claims of the defendant Charles Molle been addressed so as to thereby state that his rights have been adjudicated.

This Court has in the past stated that no appeal will lie from an order granting a partial summary judgment as such is not a final order under Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P. Hayes v. Nielson, Wyo., 568 P.2d 905 (1977).

Furthermore, this Court has stated that despite an express determination by the trial court that there is no just reason for delay, this Court will not consider piecemeal appeals. Mott v. England, Wyo., 604 P.2d 560, 563 (1979); Butts v. Gierse, Wyo., 573 P.2d 1365 (1978).

On the Court’s own motion, pursuant to Rule 1.02, W.R.A.P., it is

ORDERED that the above-captioned appeal be and is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ranch v. Iberlin Ranch, 614 P.2d 1339, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 310 (Wyo. 1980).

614 P.2d 1339 (Ranch v. Iberlin Ranch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horse Shoe Land & Livestock, Inc. v. Federal Land Bank of Omaha
740 P.2d 936 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1987)