Rancel v. Creswell

30 Pa. 158
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 Pa. 158 (Rancel v. Creswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rancel v. Creswell, 30 Pa. 158 (Pa. 1858).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— There is no difficulty in Creswell’s title. It was devised to him for life, with remainder to his issue, and this plainly gives him an estate tail. He has barred the entail according to law, and thus converted his estate into a fee simple, and the purchaser of it shows no valid objection to the complete execution of his contract. The authorities on this subject are so well presented by the defendant in error, that we are saved from repeating them.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark Estate
75 Pa. D. & C.2d 511 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1976)
Armstrong v. Michener
28 A. 447 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Pa. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rancel-v-creswell-pa-1858.