Ranbuska v. Ontario Knife Co.

259 A.D. 968, 20 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459

This text of 259 A.D. 968 (Ranbuska v. Ontario Knife Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ranbuska v. Ontario Knife Co., 259 A.D. 968, 20 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party, with leave to the defendant to plead the facts used to support its motion in an answer as a defense, and defendant is given ten days to answer after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry thereof. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting the motion. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in a silicosis action.) Present • — ■ Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCum, JJ. [See post, p. 1057.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 968, 20 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranbuska-v-ontario-knife-co-nyappdiv-1940.