Ranalli v. Zeppetelli

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ranalli v. Zeppetelli

94 N.Y.S. 561

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 561 (Ranalli v. Zeppetelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ranalli v. Zeppetelli, 94 N.Y.S. 561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The action was upon a contract, and no contract that would warrant a recovery by the plaintiff was shown. The arrangement that preceded the lease was merged in the lease. If the lease was executed under, a mutual mistake of, fact, it may be reformed, and appropriate relief thereupon had.

The judgment will be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The action was upon a contract, and no contract that would warrant a recovery by the plaintiff was shown. The arrangement that preceded the lease was merged in the lease. If the lease was executed under, a mutual mistake of, fact, it may be reformed, and appropriate relief thereupon had.

The judgment will be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.Y.S. 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranalli-v-zeppetelli-nyappterm-1905.