Ranalli v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ranalli v. Safir

250 A.D.2d 507, 672 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5862

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 507 (Ranalli v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ranalli v. Safir, 250 A.D.2d 507, 672 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner effective September 9, 1996, dismissing petitioner from his position as a police officer, and determination of respondent Board of Trustees, denying petitioner’s application for disability retirement on the ground of his earlier dismissal as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the peti[508]*508tion denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Charles Ramos, JJ, entered June 9, 1997) dismissed, without costs.

The Police Commissioner’s determination that petitioner engaged in prohibited off-duty employment while on sick report, possessed a blackjack, had unauthorized ammunition in his firearm, and attempted to facilitate the sale of steroids is supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180). The penalty of dismissal, based on misconduct that occurred when petitioner had been a police officer for only two years, and consequent loss of pension rights, does not shock our sense of fairness (compare, Matter of Ivory v City of N. Y., Dept. of Envtl. Protection, 125 AD2d 217, lv denied 70 NY2d 602). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Tom and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner effective September 9, 1996, dismissing petitioner from his position as a police officer, and determination of respondent Board of Trustees, denying petitioner’s application for disability retirement on the ground of his earlier dismissal as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the peti[508]*508tion denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Charles Ramos, JJ, entered June 9, 1997) dismissed, without costs.

The Police Commissioner’s determination that petitioner engaged in prohibited off-duty employment while on sick report, possessed a blackjack, had unauthorized ammunition in his firearm, and attempted to facilitate the sale of steroids is supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180). The penalty of dismissal, based on misconduct that occurred when petitioner had been a police officer for only two years, and consequent loss of pension rights, does not shock our sense of fairness (compare, Matter of Ivory v City of N. Y., Dept. of Envtl. Protection, 125 AD2d 217, lv denied 70 NY2d 602). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Tom and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 507, 672 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranalli-v-safir-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack