Ranalli v. Breed
This text of 251 A.D. 750 (Ranalli v. Breed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for malpractice, the facts of which had not been discovered until the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prae. Act, § 50) had run, order and the judgment entered thereon dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Tulloch v. Haselo (218 App. Div. 313) and Conklin v. Draper (229 id. 227; afld., 254 N. Y. 620). Present—■ Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 750, 297 N.Y.S. 688, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ranalli-v-breed-nyappdiv-1937.