Ranaghan v. Sullivan, Ranaghan, Bailey & Gleason, P.A.

432 So. 2d 641, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27886
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 1983·No. No. 82-1981·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for temporary injunction for failure to demonstrate irreparable harm and the lack of an adequate remedy at law. We dismiss that portion of the appeal which concerns the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to dissolve the professional association. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant to raise the issue by plenary appeal.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ranaghan v. Sullivan, Ranaghan, Bailey & Gleason, P.A., 432 So. 2d 641, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27886 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

432 So. 2d 641 (Ranaghan v. Sullivan, Ranaghan, Bailey & Gleason, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. Fairchild
455 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Neuman v. Ferris
432 So. 2d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)