Rana v. Thomas
This text of 983 So. 2d 745 (Rana v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.150 (providing that the trial court may strike sham pleadings); Cromer v. Mullally, 861 So.2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (stating that a pleading is considered a sham “when it is inherently false and clearly known to be false at the time the pleading was made”); Ader v. Temple Ner Tamid, 339 So.2d 268, 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (stating that to be stricken as a sham under Rule 1.150, a pleading must appear “clearly false, as a mere pretense, set up in bad faith, and without color of fact”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
983 So. 2d 745, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8445, 2008 WL 2356671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rana-v-thomas-fladistctapp-2008.