Rana v. Thomas

983 So. 2d 745, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8445, 2008 WL 2356671

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.150 (providing that the trial court may strike sham pleadings); Cromer v. Mullally, 861 So.2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (stating that a pleading is considered a sham “when it is inherently false and clearly known to be false at the time the pleading was made”); Ader v. Temple Ner Tamid, 339 So.2d 268, 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (stating that to be stricken as a sham under Rule 1.150, a pleading must appear “clearly false, as a mere pretense, set up in bad faith, and without color of fact”).