Rana v. Thomas

983 So. 2d 745, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8445, 2008 WL 2356671
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 2008
DocketNo. 3D06-2673
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 983 So. 2d 745 (Rana v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rana v. Thomas, 983 So. 2d 745, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8445, 2008 WL 2356671 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.150 (providing that the trial court may strike sham pleadings); Cromer v. Mullally, 861 So.2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (stating that a pleading is considered a sham “when it is inherently false and clearly known to be false at the time the pleading was made”); Ader v. Temple Ner Tamid, 339 So.2d 268, 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (stating that to be stricken as a sham under Rule 1.150, a pleading must appear “clearly false, as a mere pretense, set up in bad faith, and without color of fact”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. State
983 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 So. 2d 745, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8445, 2008 WL 2356671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rana-v-thomas-fladistctapp-2008.