Rana v. State
51 Ark. 481
Opinion
The presumption is that the defendant was the owner of the liquor sold. State v. Devers, 38 Ark., 517.
There was no proof that he sold as the agent of a licensed ■dealer. But this was a matter of defence and the burden was upon the accused. The jury could not rightfully have returned any other verdict upon .the evidence. The instructions could not have prejudiced the accused.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rana v. State, 51 Ark. 481 (Ark. 1889).
51 Ark. 481 (Rana v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Stern
254 N.W. 765 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1934)
Josey v. State
114 S.W. 216 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)