Rana v. State
51 Ark. 481
This text of 51 Ark. 481 (Rana v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rana v. State, 51 Ark. 481 (Ark. 1889).
Opinion
The presumption is that the defendant was the owner of the liquor sold. State v. Devers, 38 Ark., 517.
There was no proof that he sold as the agent of a licensed ■dealer. But this was a matter of defence and the burden was upon the accused. The jury could not rightfully have returned any other verdict upon .the evidence. The instructions could not have prejudiced the accused.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Stern
254 N.W. 765 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1934)
Josey v. State
114 S.W. 216 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 Ark. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rana-v-state-ark-1889.