Rana v. Landstar TLC

75 S.W.3d 351, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 2002 WL 1012556
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rana v. Landstar TLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 798
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 21, 2002·No. No. WD 60336·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Appellant Bill Rana appeals his workers’ compensation award made by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. That award found, after remand from an earlier appeal (Rana v. Landstar, 46 S.W.3d 614 (Mo.App.2001)), that Rana suffered from a compensable injury, assigning a 10% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rana v. Landstar TLC, 75 S.W.3d 351, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 2002 WL 1012556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

75 S.W.3d 351 (Rana v. Landstar TLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rana v. LANDSTAR TLC
46 S.W.3d 614 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)