Rana v. Bishop Insurance of Hawaii, Inc.

713 P.2d 1363, 68 Haw. 269
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 1985
DocketNO. 10097; CIVIL NO. 78040
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 713 P.2d 1363 (Rana v. Bishop Insurance of Hawaii, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rana v. Bishop Insurance of Hawaii, Inc., 713 P.2d 1363, 68 Haw. 269 (haw 1985).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WAKATSUKI, J.

The question before the court, upon a petition for writ of certiorari, is whether the Hawaii No-Fault Law, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 294, as amended, precludes the stacking of basic no-fault insurance coverages where the injured named insured has a single insurance policy covering several vehicles.

The Intermediate Court of Appeals, upon reviewing legislative history, held that HRS §§ 294-2(10)1 and -3(c)2 preclude the stacking of basic no-fault insurance policies and coverages.

We adopt and affirm the reasoning and decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaiama v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc.
930 P.2d 1352 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1997)
AIG Hawaii Insurance v. Estate of Caraang
851 P.2d 321 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1993)
National Union Fire Insurance v. Villanueva
716 F. Supp. 450 (D. Hawaii, 1989)
Crawford for Crawford v. Crawford
745 P.2d 285 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1987)
Hubbell v. Iseke
727 P.2d 1131 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1986)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wolfe
638 F. Supp. 1247 (D. Hawaii, 1986)
Neumann v. Ramil
722 P.2d 1048 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
713 P.2d 1363, 68 Haw. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rana-v-bishop-insurance-of-hawaii-inc-haw-1985.