Rana v. Bishop Insurance of Hawaii, Inc.
This text of 713 P.2d 1363 (Rana v. Bishop Insurance of Hawaii, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
The question before the court, upon a petition for writ of certiorari, is whether the Hawaii No-Fault Law, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 294, as amended, precludes the stacking of basic no-fault insurance coverages where the injured named insured has a single insurance policy covering several vehicles.
The Intermediate Court of Appeals, upon reviewing legislative history, held that HRS §§ 294-2(10)1 and -3(c)2 preclude the stacking of basic no-fault insurance policies and coverages.
We adopt and affirm the reasoning and decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
713 P.2d 1363, 68 Haw. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rana-v-bishop-insurance-of-hawaii-inc-haw-1985.