RAMZI AKEL and CATHERINA AKEL v. CHARLES SCARDINA, CHERYL SCARDINA, ANGELO SCARDINA and ELISABETH SCARDINA
This text of RAMZI AKEL and CATHERINA AKEL v. CHARLES SCARDINA, CHERYL SCARDINA, ANGELO SCARDINA and ELISABETH SCARDINA (RAMZI AKEL and CATHERINA AKEL v. CHARLES SCARDINA, CHERYL SCARDINA, ANGELO SCARDINA and ELISABETH SCARDINA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
RAMZI AKEL and CATERINA AKEL, Appellants,
v.
CHARLES SCARDINA, CHERYL SCARDINA, ANGELO SCARDINA and ELISABETH SCARDINA, Appellees.
No. 4D20-1561
[April 22, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Lisa S. Small, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 502014CA004618 and 502014CA005592.
Steven M. Katzman and Helaina Bardunias of Katzman, Wasserman, Bennardini & Rubinstein, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.
Isaac J. Mitrani, Pamela A. Chamberlin and Daniel S. Bitran of Mitrani, Rynor, Adamsky & Toland, P.A., Miami Beach, for appellees Charles Scardina and Cheryl Scardina.
Gerald F. Richman of Fisher Potter Hodas, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellees Angelo Scardina and Elisabeth Scardina.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
DAMOORGIAN, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RAMZI AKEL and CATHERINA AKEL v. CHARLES SCARDINA, CHERYL SCARDINA, ANGELO SCARDINA and ELISABETH SCARDINA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramzi-akel-and-catherina-akel-v-charles-scardina-cheryl-scardina-angelo-fladistctapp-2021.