Ramunno v. Fine Jewelers Atlantic Guild, Inc.

568 So. 2d 1355, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519, 1990 WL 172835
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 1990
DocketNo. 89-03408
StatusPublished

This text of 568 So. 2d 1355 (Ramunno v. Fine Jewelers Atlantic Guild, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramunno v. Fine Jewelers Atlantic Guild, Inc., 568 So. 2d 1355, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519, 1990 WL 172835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed the complaint filed against the defendants/appellees because of a lack of connexity, i.e., the link between the cause of action and the activities of the defendant corporations in the forum state. While this appeal was pending our supreme court issued an opinion in White v. Pepsico, Inc., 568 So.2d 886 (Fla.1990), which the appellees, in a motion to remand, candidly submit clarifies the law in this area. In applying the law on service of process on corporations through a registered agent, the trial court, naturally, had no occasion to anticipate White v. Pepsico. We therefore reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings in accord with White v. Pepsico.

Reversed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Pepsico, Inc.
568 So. 2d 886 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
568 So. 2d 1355, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519, 1990 WL 172835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramunno-v-fine-jewelers-atlantic-guild-inc-fladistctapp-1990.