Ramtin Zakikhani v. Hyundai Motor Company

District Court, C.D. California·Decided March 14, 2022·No. 8:20-cv-01584·Unknown

Opinion

Case 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE Document 87 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 24 Page ID #:1544

RAMTIN ZAKIKHANI, KIMBERLY Case No.: 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE ELZINGA, THEODORE MADDOX JACQUELINE WASHINGTON, ORDER ELAINE PEACOCK, MELODY IRISH, and DONNA TINSLEY, DISCOVERY MATTER individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, KIA CORPORATION, and KIA AMERICA, INC., Defendants

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 86), and for good cause shown, the Court finds and orders as follows. / / / / / / / / /

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE Case 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE Document 87 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 24 Page ID #:1545

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this Action involves production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This Action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical, and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this Action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information may consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial information, private customer information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of Discovery Materials, to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the Action, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE Document 87 Filed 03/14/22 Page 3 of 24 Page ID #:1546

not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF UNDER SEAL FILING PROCEDURE The Parties acknowledge, as set forth in Section 14.3 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle the Parties to file confidential information under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Elec., Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made with respect to Protected Material that a Party seeks to file under seal. The Parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. Further, if a Party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n., 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal, the Party seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE Document 87 Filed 03/14/22 Page 4 of 24 Page ID #:1547

facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by declaration. Any requests for sealing filed in connection with a dispositive motion, a class certification motion, or trial must be granted by the District Judge presiding over the Action. Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 4. DEFINITIONS 4.1 Action: the above-captioned action, Ramtin Zakikhani, et al. v. Hyundai Motor Company, et al., 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE (C.D. Cal.). 4.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Stipulated Protective Order. 4.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: For purposes of this Stipulated Protective Order, information that may be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” includes any information that a Party intends to produce and believes in good faith to be confidential or sensitive non-public information, including, but not limited to, research, design, development, financial, technical, marketing, planning, personal, or commercial information, as such terms are used in Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable case law interpreting Rule 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items also include information that a Party is required to maintain as confidential under the terms of an agreement or other understanding. 4.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE Document 87 Filed 03/14/22 Page 5 of 24 Page ID #:1548

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramtin Zakikhani v. Hyundai Motor Company, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Ramtin Zakikhani v. Hyundai Motor Company (Ramtin Zakikhani v. Hyundai Motor Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Caraballo
447 F.3d 26 (First Circuit, 2006)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 576 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)