Ramseyer v. Williamson
This text of 639 So. 2d 205 (Ramseyer v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kenneth RAMSEYER, Appellant,
v.
William WILLIAMSON and Joyce Williamson, his wife, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*206 Gary A. Bloom, Palm Coast, and Bradford D. Kaufman, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
HARRIS, Chief Judge.
Appellant, Kenneth Ramseyer, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to dissolve a writ of garnishment. Because this is not an appealable non-final order pursuant to Rule 9.130, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, this appeal is dismissed.
We note that Mr. Ramseyer included within his initial brief a document entitled "Petition for Writ of Prohibition." Because this document was not properly filed with this court, it is without effect.
DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
639 So. 2d 205, 1994 WL 380060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramseyer-v-williamson-fladistctapp-1994.