Ramsey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ramsey v. State

197 S.W. 869, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 424

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 10, 1917·No. No. 4582·Published

Opinion

DAYIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol; his punishment being assessed at 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The motion for a new trial raises the insufficiency of the evidence and the refusal of the court to give requested instructions. The evidence is not in the record, nor was any bill of exceptions reserved. There is nothing, therefore, presented that can be revised.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAYIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol; his punishment being assessed at 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The motion for a new trial raises the insufficiency of the evidence and the refusal of the court to give requested instructions. The evidence is not in the record, nor was any bill of exceptions reserved. There is nothing, therefore, presented that can be revised.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Ramsey v. State, 197 S.W. 869, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 424 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

197 S.W. 869 (Ramsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.