Ramsey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ramsey v. State

1911 OK CR 502, 118 P. 1114, 6 Okla. Crim. 680, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 504

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 21, 1911

DocketNo. A-957.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 502 (Ramsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. State, 1911 OK CR 502, 118 P. 1114, 6 Okla. Crim. 680, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 504 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, Earnest Ramsey and O. Williams, were convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and, on the 4th day of October, 1910, were each sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and serve thirty days in the county jail. The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on the 24th day of November, 1910, but were never filed in the office of the clerk of the county court of Bryan county, as required by sec. 6951, Snyder's Stat. Eor this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to strike the cash-made from the record. The motion is sustained, and the case-made is accordingly stricken. No error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiffs in error appears in the transcript. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, Earnest Ramsey and O. Williams, were convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and, on the 4th day of October, 1910, were each sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and serve thirty days in the county jail. The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on the 24th day of November, 1910, but were never filed in the office of the clerk of the county court of Bryan county, as required by sec. 6951, Snyder's Stat. Eor this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to strike the cash-made from the record. The motion is sustained, and the case-made is accordingly stricken. No error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiffs in error appears in the transcript. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 502, 118 P. 1114, 6 Okla. Crim. 680, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.