Ramsey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ramsey v. State

485 S.W.3d 783, 2016 WL 1317989, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 314

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 5, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102933

StatusPublished

This text of 485 S.W.3d 783 (Ramsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. State, 485 S.W.3d 783, 2016 WL 1317989, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela D. Ramsey appeals the denial of her motion for a change of judge during the post-conviction proceedings and the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela D. Ramsey appeals the denial of her motion for a change of judge during the post-conviction proceedings and the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 S.W.3d 783, 2016 WL 1317989, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-state-moctapp-2016.