Ramsey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ramsey v. State

693 So. 2d 96, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 1997 WL 228539

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 1997

DocketNo. 95-03521

StatusPublished

This text of 693 So. 2d 96 (Ramsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. State, 693 So. 2d 96, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 1997 WL 228539 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Ramsey appeals his judgment and sentences for possession of cocaine and drug paraphernalia. We affirm his convictions without discussion. However, we strike the portion of special probation condition (A) which requires appellant to pay for drug and alcohol testing because it was not announced at sentencing. See Head v. State, 687 So.2d 281 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We affirm the sentences in all other respects.

PARKER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Ramsey appeals his judgment and sentences for possession of cocaine and drug paraphernalia. We affirm his convictions without discussion. However, we strike the portion of special probation condition (A) which requires appellant to pay for drug and alcohol testing because it was not announced at sentencing. See Head v. State, 687 So.2d 281 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We affirm the sentences in all other respects.

PARKER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 So. 2d 96, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 1997 WL 228539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack