Ramsey v. State
This text of 632 So. 2d 700 (Ramsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gary Leo RAMSEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*701 Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appellant's motion is facially insufficient for failing to include the oath required by rule 3.850. Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985). Nor does appellant's motion contain any form of unnotarized oath such as that approved in State v. Shearer, 628 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1993).
We therefore affirm the order of the trial court, without prejudice to the filing of a properly sworn motion.
SMITH, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
632 So. 2d 700, 1994 WL 59360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.