Ramsey v. State ex rel. Koster

403 S.W.3d 144, 2013 WL 3328867, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 814
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2013·No. No. WD 75881·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Billy Ramsey, pro se, appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment. Ramsey claims that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing his action for declaratory judgment because (1) he pled facts demonstrating that a justiciable controversy exists specifically relating to a judgment entered five years earlier in an action brought by the State against Ramsey pursuant to the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act authorizing the State’s seizure of Ramsey’s assets; and (2) he was denied his right to challenge whether the State demonstrated the statutory prerequisite of good cause in seeking seizure of Ramsey’s assets in the previous action. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramsey v. State ex rel. Koster, 403 S.W.3d 144, 2013 WL 3328867, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 814 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

403 S.W.3d 144 (Ramsey v. State ex rel. Koster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.