Ramsey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ramsey v. State

116 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 687

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 8, 1928

Docket4 Div. 381.

StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 926 (Ramsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. State, 116 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still and appeals. We have read this reborden banc, and without entering into a detailed discussion of the testimony we are. clear to the conclusion that the state has utterly failed to meet the burden of proof resting upon it, and the 'Court should have given the general charge -for the defendant as requested -in writing. Por this error the judgment is reversed and the" cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still and appeals. We have read this reborden banc, and without entering into a detailed discussion of the testimony we are. clear to the conclusion that the state has utterly failed to meet the burden of proof resting upon it, and the 'Court should have given the general charge -for the defendant as requested -in writing. Por this error the judgment is reversed and the" cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-state-alactapp-1928.