Ramsey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ramsey v. State

116 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 687

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramsey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 83 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1928·No. 4 Div. 381.·Published

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still and appeals. We have read this reborden banc, and without entering into a detailed discussion of the testimony we are. clear to the conclusion that the state has utterly failed to meet the burden of proof resting upon it, and the 'Court should have given the general charge -for the defendant as requested -in writing. Por this error the judgment is reversed and the" cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still and appeals. We have read this reborden banc, and without entering into a detailed discussion of the testimony we are. clear to the conclusion that the state has utterly failed to meet the burden of proof resting upon it, and the 'Court should have given the general charge -for the defendant as requested -in writing. Por this error the judgment is reversed and the" cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Ramsey v. State, 116 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

116 So. 926 (Ramsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.