Ramsey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ramsey v. State

92 So. 94, 18 Ala. App. 373, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 81

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 1922

Docket7 Div. 726.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 So. 94 (Ramsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramsey v. State, 92 So. 94, 18 Ala. App. 373, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 81 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

[1] The motion of the appellee to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause must prevail. The record shows that it was not approved within 90 days from the date it was presented. Sections 3019 and 3020, Code 1907. The ’ appellant was convicted under a complaint which charged him with larceny, and with buying, concealing, receiving,-, or aiding in concealing stolen' property. >-

[2] There being no bill of exceptions, we will not review the action of the trial court in refusing certain written instructions requested by the defendant. Moran v. State, 15 Ala. App. 379, 73 South. 748, 13 Mich. Digest, p. 795, § 712. We have examined the record and find no reversible error.

The judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRITT, J.

[1] The motion of the appellee to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause must prevail. The record shows that it was not approved within 90 days from the date it was presented. Sections 3019 and 3020, Code 1907. The ’ appellant was convicted under a complaint which charged him with larceny, and with buying, concealing, receiving,-, or aiding in concealing stolen' property. >-

[2] There being no bill of exceptions, we will not review the action of the trial court in refusing certain written instructions requested by the defendant. Moran v. State, 15 Ala. App. 379, 73 South. 748, 13 Mich. Digest, p. 795, § 712. We have examined the record and find no reversible error.

The judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 So. 94, 18 Ala. App. 373, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramsey-v-state-alactapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack